Science and the Theory of Evolution

The English word, science is from the Latin word, scientia, meaning “knowledge”.  Thus, science is supposed to be the accumulation of what we are able to know of our universe and everything in it. The pursuit of science, or knowledge often begins with proposed theories, and scientists are usually able to determine the difference between theories that prove helpful for research and those that do not.  This is because legitimate scientific theories should meet at least three criteria:    #1) any theory should be verifiable by experimentation    #2) any theory should be useful for promoting objective research    #3) any theory must have predictive value. My question is, does the almost universally accepted “theory” of (organic, big-bang, single-celled-organisms-to-man) evolution fit these criteria?  Frankly, no. 1.  THE “THEORY” OF EVOLUTION IS NOT VERIFIABLE BY EXPERIMENTATION It is dogmatically preached that matter gave rise to life, which in turn gave rise to mentality and consciousness and that it...

Marty Kessler